• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Conventus Law

Conventus Law

Conventus Law

  • About Us
  • Channels
    • Jurisdiction Channel
    • Practice Area Channel
    • Industry Channel
    • Business Of Law
    • Law Firms
    • Special Reports
  • Video
  • Events
  • Explore
  • Search
  • Membership
  • Conventus Doc
x
Search

More results...

Generic filters
Home » Special Report » Q&A – SPACs In Singapore

Q&A – SPACs In Singapore

October 13, 2021

October 13, 2021 by

October, 2021

 

Q&A - SPACs In Singapore

 

SPAC vs IPO. What are the main differences and how to decide which is best for an asset company?

An initial public offering (IPO) involves a firm that has a history of operations, as well as a business and assets that generate income. An IPO also entails a long book-building and underwriting procedure by investment banks and other intermediaries, which can take anywhere from 9 to 12 months or longer to complete.

A SPAC eliminates the preceding prerequisites and may be completed in 3 to 6 months (this

timeframe related to the time it takes for the SPAC to be listed and does not cover the

acquisition of a business for the purposes of a business combination).

Therefore, a SPAC allows the SPAC listee: 

(i) To circumvent IPO requirements such as the need for financial and operating track records.

(ii) To avoid the uncertainty of the price discovery process that accompanies the book building and underwriting process of an IPO. The price discovery in an IPO depends on market conditions as well. With respect to SPACs, the issue price can be pre-negotiated before the listing.

(iii) To incur less expenditure (since there are no underwriting fees) and to spend less time than a traditional IPO.

(iv) To leverage the expertise of an experienced sponsor to assist and guide the target company that will be acquired to grow its business. SPAC sponsors often are experienced financial and industrial professionals. They can tap into their network of contacts to offer management expertise or take on a role themselves on the board.

(v) If the target company is a startup, SPACs allow the target company to negotiate favourable transaction conditions with the SPAC sponsor, such as valuation and investment flow (currently not available for the traditional IPO route).

Perhaps more crucially, a SPAC’s deal price occurs early in the process, at the moment the business combination agreement is signed, as opposed to an IPO, which occurs at the conclusion of the transaction. Locking in pricing earlier in the process has been especially attractive amidst markets roiled with uncertainty due to COVID-19.

 

Continue to full article here

Primary Sidebar

PRESS RELEASES

  • SyCipLaw Maintains Outstanding Rankings In All Categories In Asialaw 2025. 31 October 2025
  • SyCipLaw Recognized In ITR World Tax 2026 Rankings. 31 October 2025
  • Saint-Gobain-Fosroc Acquisition Awarded Impact Deal Of The Year In ITR EMEA Tax Awards 2025. 31 October 2025
  • SSEK Partner Leads Panel Discussion At 7th ICC Indonesia Arbitration Day. 31 October 2025
  • US – GE Vernova To Acquire Prolec. 31 October 2025

NEWS FEED

    October 31, 2025

    US – DOJ Prioritizes Discovery Compliance Through ‘Comply With Care’ Taskforce.

    October 31, 2025

    EU – Platform Regulation And Privacy – Unpacking The EDPB’s New Guidelines.

    October 31, 2025

    India – FIG Paper No. [51] (VDA Series 7): Stablecoins: Recent Indian And Global Regulatory Trends.

    - Anu Tiwari - Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas,
    October 31, 2025

    India – Part II Of The IFSC Education Series: FAQs On Setting Up International Branch Campus Or Offshore Education Campus In GIFT IFSC.

    October 30, 2025

    Indonesia Draft Ministerial Regulation: Tax Treatment Of Zakat, Religious Donations And Gifts (Hibah).

    - Ira Andamara Eddymurthy - SSEK,
    October 30, 2025

    UK – FRC Enforcement Refresh: What Next For The AEP?

    October 30, 2025

    UK – First Challenge To FCA’s New Investigation Publicity Policy Dismissed.

    October 30, 2025

    India – Legal Infirmities In Refusal Of A Patent: Calcutta High Court Rules Remand Inevitable.

    - DPS Parmar - Lex Orbis,
    October 30, 2025

    India – Technical Advancement Required To Secure Patent: Delhi High Court Affirms.

    - DPS Parmar - Lex Orbis,
    October 30, 2025

    You Can’t Manage What You Don’t Measure: Data And AI In The Modern Legal Function.

Footer

Conventus Law
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

CONVENTUS LAW

  • About Us
  • Explore
  • Video
  • Events
  • Contact Us
  • Jurisdiction Channel
  • Practice Area Channel
  • Industry Channel
  • Law Firms
  • Business Of Law
  • Special Reports

OTHERS

CONVENTUS DOCS
CONVENTUS PEOPLE

3/f, 13/F, Two Harbourfront, 22 Tak Fung Street, Hunghom, Kowloon, Hong Kong

social@conventuslaw.com

Terms of use | Privacy statement © 2025 Conventus Law. All Rights Reserved.