• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Conventus Law

Conventus Law

Conventus Law

  • About Us
  • Channels
    • Jurisdiction Channel
    • Practice Area Channel
    • Industry Channel
    • Business Of Law
    • Law Firms
    • Special Reports
  • Video
  • Events
  • Explore
  • Search
  • Membership
  • Conventus Doc
x
Search

More results...

Generic filters
Home » Special Report » Q&A – SPACs In Singapore

Q&A – SPACs In Singapore

October 13, 2021

October 13, 2021 by

October, 2021

 

Q&A - SPACs In Singapore

 

SPAC vs IPO. What are the main differences and how to decide which is best for an asset company?

An initial public offering (IPO) involves a firm that has a history of operations, as well as a business and assets that generate income. An IPO also entails a long book-building and underwriting procedure by investment banks and other intermediaries, which can take anywhere from 9 to 12 months or longer to complete.

A SPAC eliminates the preceding prerequisites and may be completed in 3 to 6 months (this

timeframe related to the time it takes for the SPAC to be listed and does not cover the

acquisition of a business for the purposes of a business combination).

Therefore, a SPAC allows the SPAC listee: 

(i) To circumvent IPO requirements such as the need for financial and operating track records.

(ii) To avoid the uncertainty of the price discovery process that accompanies the book building and underwriting process of an IPO. The price discovery in an IPO depends on market conditions as well. With respect to SPACs, the issue price can be pre-negotiated before the listing.

(iii) To incur less expenditure (since there are no underwriting fees) and to spend less time than a traditional IPO.

(iv) To leverage the expertise of an experienced sponsor to assist and guide the target company that will be acquired to grow its business. SPAC sponsors often are experienced financial and industrial professionals. They can tap into their network of contacts to offer management expertise or take on a role themselves on the board.

(v) If the target company is a startup, SPACs allow the target company to negotiate favourable transaction conditions with the SPAC sponsor, such as valuation and investment flow (currently not available for the traditional IPO route).

Perhaps more crucially, a SPAC’s deal price occurs early in the process, at the moment the business combination agreement is signed, as opposed to an IPO, which occurs at the conclusion of the transaction. Locking in pricing earlier in the process has been especially attractive amidst markets roiled with uncertainty due to COVID-19.

 

Continue to full article here

Primary Sidebar

PRESS RELEASES

  • Linklaters Advises Barings On Acquisition Of Logistics Portfolio In Central Germany. 29 January 2026
  • Linklaters Advises On The First Southeast Asian Sovereign Bond Issuances In 2026. 28 January 2026
  • Linklaters Advises On CMOC’s Jumbo US$1.2bn Convertible Bond Issuance. 28 January 2026
  • US – IP Attorney John Paik Joins Crowell & Moring’s Patents Group. 28 January 2026
  • US – Crowell & Moring Welcomes Tanaz Moghadam As Public Service Counsel. 28 January 2026

NEWS FEED

    January 29, 2026

    Crystal Ball Gazing – What Will The New EU Merger Guidelines Deliver?

    January 29, 2026

    Government Proposes Amends To UK Competition Regime: What You Need To Know.

    January 29, 2026

    Linklaters – Games And Interactive Entertainment Legal Outlook 2026.

    January 28, 2026

    EU Cybersecurity Act Proposal: Key Provisions, Scope, And Implications For Organisations.

    January 28, 2026

    Why Most External Legal Matters Run Over Budget And How To Fix It.

    - Sacha Kirk - Lawcadia,
    January 28, 2026

    US – FedRAMP Proposes Updates To Authorization Process—Six New RFCs Released For Public Comment.

    January 28, 2026

    US – Atlantic Biologicals Opioid DPA: DOJ Continues Ramp Up Of Criminal Corporate Healthcare Enforcement.

    January 28, 2026

    Regulatory Considerations for Cross-Border Lending and Security Creation in Hong Kong.

    - David Cameron - DCLO,
    January 28, 2026

    Hong Kong’s Evolving Framework for Digital Asset Regulation.

    - David Cameron - DCLO,
    January 27, 2026

    EU – The New Alternative Dispute Resolution Framework – Directive 2025/2647.

Footer

Conventus Law
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

CONVENTUS LAW

  • About Us
  • Explore
  • Video
  • Events
  • Contact Us
  • Jurisdiction Channel
  • Practice Area Channel
  • Industry Channel
  • Law Firms
  • Business Of Law
  • Special Reports

OTHERS

CONVENTUS DOCS
CONVENTUS PEOPLE

3/f, 13/F, Two Harbourfront, 22 Tak Fung Street, Hunghom, Kowloon, Hong Kong

social@conventuslaw.com

Terms of use | Privacy statement © 2026 Conventus Law. All Rights Reserved.