• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Conventus Law

Conventus Law

Conventus Law

  • About Us
  • Channels
    • Jurisdiction Channel
    • Practice Area Channel
    • Industry Channel
    • Business Of Law
    • Law Firms
    • Special Reports
  • Video
  • Events
  • Explore
  • Search
  • Membership
  • Conventus Doc
x
Search

More results...

Generic filters
Home » Special Report » Q&A – SPACs In Singapore

Q&A – SPACs In Singapore

October 13, 2021

October 13, 2021 by

October, 2021

 

Q&A - SPACs In Singapore

 

SPAC vs IPO. What are the main differences and how to decide which is best for an asset company?

An initial public offering (IPO) involves a firm that has a history of operations, as well as a business and assets that generate income. An IPO also entails a long book-building and underwriting procedure by investment banks and other intermediaries, which can take anywhere from 9 to 12 months or longer to complete.

A SPAC eliminates the preceding prerequisites and may be completed in 3 to 6 months (this

timeframe related to the time it takes for the SPAC to be listed and does not cover the

acquisition of a business for the purposes of a business combination).

Therefore, a SPAC allows the SPAC listee: 

(i) To circumvent IPO requirements such as the need for financial and operating track records.

(ii) To avoid the uncertainty of the price discovery process that accompanies the book building and underwriting process of an IPO. The price discovery in an IPO depends on market conditions as well. With respect to SPACs, the issue price can be pre-negotiated before the listing.

(iii) To incur less expenditure (since there are no underwriting fees) and to spend less time than a traditional IPO.

(iv) To leverage the expertise of an experienced sponsor to assist and guide the target company that will be acquired to grow its business. SPAC sponsors often are experienced financial and industrial professionals. They can tap into their network of contacts to offer management expertise or take on a role themselves on the board.

(v) If the target company is a startup, SPACs allow the target company to negotiate favourable transaction conditions with the SPAC sponsor, such as valuation and investment flow (currently not available for the traditional IPO route).

Perhaps more crucially, a SPAC’s deal price occurs early in the process, at the moment the business combination agreement is signed, as opposed to an IPO, which occurs at the conclusion of the transaction. Locking in pricing earlier in the process has been especially attractive amidst markets roiled with uncertainty due to COVID-19.

 

Continue to full article here

Primary Sidebar

PRESS RELEASES

  • Baker McKenzie Advises On Jiangsu New Vision Automotive Electronics’ Global Offering And Hong Kong IPO. 26 March 2026
  • US – Am Law 100 Firm Akin Operationalizes Embedded AI Across 65+ Million Documents With NetDocuments. 26 March 2026
  • Baker McKenzie Advises On Up To USD 2.3 Billion Acquisition Financing For Arise Digital Technology. 26 March 2026
  • Hong Kong – Synthetic Identities And Agentic Bots Posing As Human Contribute To 8% Global Rise In Fraud Attacks – LexisNexis Risk Solutions. 26 March 2026
  • Chambers Ranks Crowell & Moring Lawyers And Practices In 2026 Europe Guide. 25 March 2026

NEWS FEED

    March 26, 2026

    India – Refusal Of Patent Without Adequate Reasoning Set Aside: Delhi High Court Remands Case For Fresh Consideration.

    - DPS Parmar - Lex Orbis,
    March 26, 2026

    India – No Licence, No Performance: Bombay High Court Restrains Restaurants From Using Sound Recordings Without License.

    - Manisha Singh - Lex Orbis,
    March 26, 2026

    India – Delhi High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal Of Smelling Disease Patent.

    - DPS Parmar - Lex Orbis,
    March 26, 2026

    India – Trademark Protection In Ayurveda: Delhi High Court Clarifies Deceptive Similarity And Dominant Features.

    - Manisha Singh - Lex Orbis,
    March 26, 2026

    China – CSRC Releases Short Swing Profit Rules.

    - XIE, Qing (Natasha) - JunHe, JunHE
    March 26, 2026

    China – The Criminal Law Risks Of ‘Raising Crayfish’: From Technological Enthusiasm To Legal Boundaries.

    - YIN, Xiao (Benjamin) - JunHe,
    March 25, 2026

    Salts V Pelican: UK Patent Infringement Appeal Fails But Novelty And Costs Arguments Succeed.

    March 25, 2026

    India – Order For Refusal Of Patent Set Aside: Delhi High Court Directs Re-Consideration Of Inventive Step Using ‘Hoffman Test’.

    - DPS Parmar - Lex Orbis,
    March 25, 2026

    India – Employment Agreement Sufficient To Establish Right To Apply: Delhi High Court Directs Examination Of Application For Grant Of Patent.

    - DPS Parmar - Lex Orbis,
    March 25, 2026

    India – Design Expired, Trademark Survives: Calcutta High Court Decides on Shape Marks.

    - Manisha Singh - Lex Orbis,

Footer

Conventus Law
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

CONVENTUS LAW

  • About Us
  • Explore
  • Video
  • Events
  • Contact Us
  • Jurisdiction Channel
  • Practice Area Channel
  • Industry Channel
  • Law Firms
  • Business Of Law
  • Special Reports

OTHERS

CONVENTUS DOCS
CONVENTUS PEOPLE

Room 1601, 16th Floor,               Wing On Centre, 111 Connaught Road Central, Hong Kong

social@conventuslaw.com

Terms of use | Privacy statement © 2026 Conventus Law. All Rights Reserved.