• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Conventus Law

Conventus Law

Conventus Law

  • About Us
  • Channels
    • Jurisdiction Channel
    • Practice Area Channel
    • Industry Channel
    • Business Of Law
    • Law Firms
    • Special Reports
  • Video
  • Events
  • Explore
  • Search
  • Membership
  • Conventus Doc
x
Search

More results...

Generic filters
Home » Special Report » Q&A – SPACs In Singapore

Q&A – SPACs In Singapore

October 13, 2021

October 13, 2021 by

October, 2021

 

Q&A - SPACs In Singapore

 

SPAC vs IPO. What are the main differences and how to decide which is best for an asset company?

An initial public offering (IPO) involves a firm that has a history of operations, as well as a business and assets that generate income. An IPO also entails a long book-building and underwriting procedure by investment banks and other intermediaries, which can take anywhere from 9 to 12 months or longer to complete.

A SPAC eliminates the preceding prerequisites and may be completed in 3 to 6 months (this

timeframe related to the time it takes for the SPAC to be listed and does not cover the

acquisition of a business for the purposes of a business combination).

Therefore, a SPAC allows the SPAC listee: 

(i) To circumvent IPO requirements such as the need for financial and operating track records.

(ii) To avoid the uncertainty of the price discovery process that accompanies the book building and underwriting process of an IPO. The price discovery in an IPO depends on market conditions as well. With respect to SPACs, the issue price can be pre-negotiated before the listing.

(iii) To incur less expenditure (since there are no underwriting fees) and to spend less time than a traditional IPO.

(iv) To leverage the expertise of an experienced sponsor to assist and guide the target company that will be acquired to grow its business. SPAC sponsors often are experienced financial and industrial professionals. They can tap into their network of contacts to offer management expertise or take on a role themselves on the board.

(v) If the target company is a startup, SPACs allow the target company to negotiate favourable transaction conditions with the SPAC sponsor, such as valuation and investment flow (currently not available for the traditional IPO route).

Perhaps more crucially, a SPAC’s deal price occurs early in the process, at the moment the business combination agreement is signed, as opposed to an IPO, which occurs at the conclusion of the transaction. Locking in pricing earlier in the process has been especially attractive amidst markets roiled with uncertainty due to COVID-19.

 

Continue to full article here

Primary Sidebar

PRESS RELEASES

  • Linklaters Advises SOM On Landmark €500 Million School Construction PPP In Flanders. 9 July 2026
  • Linklaters Advises On Burjeel Holdings’ Sukuk Programme Establishment And Subsequent Issuance. 9 July 2026
  • Singapore – Acted For The Stakeholders Of BW Water On Its Acquisition By Industrie De Nora. 9 July 2026
  • Acted For Timah Partners On Its Acquisition Under Its New Specialised Waste Management Platform. 9 July 2026
  • UK – Opus 2 Expands European Presence To Meet Growing Demand For Its Leading Litigation And Arbitration Solutions And AI Innovation. 8 July 2026

NEWS FEED

    July 9, 2026

    FRAND At The UK Supreme Court: Optis v Apple.

    July 9, 2026

    Navigating Compliance Boundaries In Cross-Border Business – Mainland – Hong Kong Regulatory Cooperation Is Underway.

    - XIE, Qing (Natasha) - JunHe, JunHE
    July 9, 2026

    Visiting, Studying And Researching In China: A Guide To National Security Legal Compliance.

    July 9, 2026

    India – Madras High Court Declines To Interfere In Trademark Opposition Proceedings Of The Trade Marks Registry.

    - Manisha Singh - Lex Orbis,
    July 9, 2026

    India – Registration, Prior Use And Trademark Enforcement: Delhi High Court Examines The Scope Of Trademark Protection.

    - Manisha Singh - Lex Orbis,
    July 9, 2026

    Singapore Court Of Appeal Clarifies Clawback Of Payments To Innocent Employees – Lau Lee Sheng V. Envy Asset Management Pte LTD (In Liquidation) [2026] SGCA 28.

    July 9, 2026

    How Legal Pros Stay Sharp When The Job Is Getting Faster.

    July 9, 2026

    Vietnam Ministry Of Justice Clarifies Transactions Involving Mortgaged Assets.

    July 9, 2026

    Indonesia’s Financial Services Authority Strengthens The Digital Backbone Of Banking Sector Through Regulation No. 1 Of 2026 On It Governance For Commercial Banks.

    - Winnie Yamashita Rolindrawan - SSEK,
    July 9, 2026

    China – Product Recall Expenses Under CGL Insurance: Coverage Issues And Insights From A Recent Chinese Court Decision.

Footer

Conventus Law
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

CONVENTUS LAW

  • About Us
  • Explore
  • Video
  • Events
  • Contact Us
  • Jurisdiction Channel
  • Practice Area Channel
  • Industry Channel
  • Law Firms
  • Business Of Law
  • Special Reports

OTHERS

CONVENTUS DOCS
CONVENTUS PEOPLE

Room 1601, 16th Floor,               Wing On Centre, 111 Connaught Road Central, Hong Kong

social@conventuslaw.com

Terms of use | Privacy statement © 2026 Conventus Law. All Rights Reserved.