• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Conventus Law

Conventus Law

Conventus Law

  • About Us
  • Channels
    • Jurisdiction Channel
    • Practice Area Channel
    • Industry Channel
    • Business Of Law
    • Law Firms
    • Special Reports
  • Video
  • Events
  • Explore
  • Search
  • Membership
  • Conventus Doc
x
Search

More results...

Generic filters
Home » Special Report » Singapore – Companies (Amendment) Bill.

Singapore – Companies (Amendment) Bill.

April 29, 2015

April 29, 2015 by

The Companies (Amendment) Bill No.25 of 2014 (“CA Bill”) that was passed on 8 October 2014 sought to develop the corporate framework through reducing regulatory burden on companies. More than 200 changes will be implemented in the Companies Act, marking it as the most extensive set of amendments since the Companies Act was first enacted.  

 

 

The first key proposal aims to expand the scope of companies who are exempted from having their accounts audited. This is done through introducing the “small companies” category, which comprises a private company who meets at least 2 of the following criteria in each of the previous two financial years: (a) Total annual revenue of not more than SGD 10m; (b) Total assets of not more than SGD 10m; and (c) number of employees does not exceed 50. These small companies will still be required to keep proper accounts. The second key provision will provide more flexibility in raising capital through repealing the current one-share-one-vote restriction, and allowing public companies to issue shares with different voting rights, including special or limited rights.     

 

The other provisions in the CA Bill include: (1) permitting private companies and companies limited by guarantee to adopt the whole or part of several model constitutions prescribed for different types of businesses; (2) allowing the registers of private company members to be maintained by ACRA; and (3) extending the requirement of disclosing conflicts of interest in transactions and shareholdings in the company and related corporations to CEOs in order to recognize the increasingly important role that these CEOs play in company decisions.

  

Another significant change in the CA Bill entails the abolishment of financial assistance prohibition for private companies. The lift in this restriction allows private companies to adopt a business-friendly approach to acquisition deals involving private companies without undergoing time-consuming “whitewash” procedures. Although public companies and their subsidiaries will still be subject to the financial assistance prohibition, the CA Bill creates a new exemption function where they will be allowed to acquire shares in the company or a holding company so long as it does not materially prejudice the interests of the company, shareholders, and its ability to pay its creditors.     

 

RHTLTWlogo+slogan-RGB  

 

For further information, please contact:

 

 

Nizam Ismail, Partner, RHTLaw Taylor Wessing

nizam.ismail@rhtlawtaylorwessing.com

 

RHTLaw Taylor Wessing Regulatory & Compliance Practice Profile in Singapore

 

Regulatory & Compliance Law Firms in Singapore

Primary Sidebar

PRESS RELEASES

  • JunHe Elects New Management Committee. 24 September 2026
  • Linklaters Advises Banks On Volkswagen Group’s US$3.05bn Bond Offering In The U.S. Capital Markets. 24 September 2026
  • Linklaters Advises RBL Bank On The Establishment Of Its Emtn Programme And Inaugural US$350m Issuance. 24 September 2026
  • AURELIS 2026 In Bangkok Brings Asia’s Legal Leaders Together As Asian Legal Accord Takes Centre Stage. 24 September 2026
  • Reap And Visa Collaborate To Launch Stablecoin Card Programs Across 100+ Markets. 24 September 2026

NEWS FEED

    September 25, 2026

    Indonesia – The Enforcement Of Court Verdict And Confiscation Procedure Under The 2026 Supreme Court Guidance.

    September 24, 2026

    Vendor Liability and Data Processing Agreements under Vietnam’s Personal Data Protection Framework.

    September 24, 2026

    India – Bald Assertion Of ‘Common General Knowledge’ Arbitrary: Bombay High Court Sets Aside Patent Refusal.

    - DPS Parmar - Lex Orbis,
    September 24, 2026

    India – Delhi High Court Refers Key Questions On Territorial Jurisdiction In Online IP Disputes To Larger Bench.

    - Manisha Singh - Lex Orbis,
    September 24, 2026

    Digital Product Vulnerability Management Under The EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA): Core Rules And Compliance Strategies For Chinese Enterprises.

    September 24, 2026

    China – Brief Commentary On The Measures For The Supervision And Administration Of Futures Companies.

    - XIE, Qing (Natasha) - JunHe, JunHE
    September 24, 2026

    UK – Indemnity Clauses: Remoteness, Causation, Concurrency And Other Key Issues.

    September 23, 2026

    India – Himachal Pradesh High Court Refuses Interim Relief In Patent Infringement Suit Over Territorial Jurisdiction.

    - DPS Parmar - Lex Orbis,
    September 23, 2026

    Reconciling AI Adoption with Security of Tenure under Philippine Labor Law.

    September 23, 2026

    Vietnam’s Energy Opportunity: From Market Potential To Investable Projects.

Footer

Conventus Law
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

CONVENTUS LAW

  • About Us
  • Explore
  • Video
  • Events
  • Contact Us
  • Jurisdiction Channel
  • Practice Area Channel
  • Industry Channel
  • Law Firms
  • Business Of Law
  • Special Reports

OTHERS

CONVENTUS DOCS
CONVENTUS PEOPLE

Room 1601, 16th Floor,               Wing On Centre, 111 Connaught Road Central, Hong Kong

social@conventuslaw.com

Terms of use | Privacy statement © 2026 Conventus Law. All Rights Reserved.