• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Conventus Law

Conventus Law

Conventus Law

  • About Us
  • Channels
    • Jurisdiction Channel
    • Practice Area Channel
    • Industry Channel
    • Business Of Law
    • Law Firms
    • Special Reports
  • Video
  • Events
  • Explore
  • Search
  • Membership
  • Conventus Doc
x
Search

More results...

Generic filters
Home » Special Report » Singapore – Companies (Amendment) Bill.

Singapore – Companies (Amendment) Bill.

April 29, 2015

April 29, 2015 by

The Companies (Amendment) Bill No.25 of 2014 (“CA Bill”) that was passed on 8 October 2014 sought to develop the corporate framework through reducing regulatory burden on companies. More than 200 changes will be implemented in the Companies Act, marking it as the most extensive set of amendments since the Companies Act was first enacted.  

 

 

The first key proposal aims to expand the scope of companies who are exempted from having their accounts audited. This is done through introducing the “small companies” category, which comprises a private company who meets at least 2 of the following criteria in each of the previous two financial years: (a) Total annual revenue of not more than SGD 10m; (b) Total assets of not more than SGD 10m; and (c) number of employees does not exceed 50. These small companies will still be required to keep proper accounts. The second key provision will provide more flexibility in raising capital through repealing the current one-share-one-vote restriction, and allowing public companies to issue shares with different voting rights, including special or limited rights.     

 

The other provisions in the CA Bill include: (1) permitting private companies and companies limited by guarantee to adopt the whole or part of several model constitutions prescribed for different types of businesses; (2) allowing the registers of private company members to be maintained by ACRA; and (3) extending the requirement of disclosing conflicts of interest in transactions and shareholdings in the company and related corporations to CEOs in order to recognize the increasingly important role that these CEOs play in company decisions.

  

Another significant change in the CA Bill entails the abolishment of financial assistance prohibition for private companies. The lift in this restriction allows private companies to adopt a business-friendly approach to acquisition deals involving private companies without undergoing time-consuming “whitewash” procedures. Although public companies and their subsidiaries will still be subject to the financial assistance prohibition, the CA Bill creates a new exemption function where they will be allowed to acquire shares in the company or a holding company so long as it does not materially prejudice the interests of the company, shareholders, and its ability to pay its creditors.     

 

RHTLTWlogo+slogan-RGB  

 

For further information, please contact:

 

 

Nizam Ismail, Partner, RHTLaw Taylor Wessing

nizam.ismail@rhtlawtaylorwessing.com

 

RHTLaw Taylor Wessing Regulatory & Compliance Practice Profile in Singapore

 

Regulatory & Compliance Law Firms in Singapore

Primary Sidebar

PRESS RELEASES

  • Patrick Dransfield appointed SCIA Chief Representative For UAE And ME. 26 March 2026
  • Baker McKenzie Advises On Jiangsu New Vision Automotive Electronics’ Global Offering And Hong Kong IPO. 26 March 2026
  • US – Am Law 100 Firm Akin Operationalizes Embedded AI Across 65+ Million Documents With NetDocuments. 26 March 2026
  • Baker McKenzie Advises On Up To USD 2.3 Billion Acquisition Financing For Arise Digital Technology. 26 March 2026
  • Hong Kong – Synthetic Identities And Agentic Bots Posing As Human Contribute To 8% Global Rise In Fraud Attacks – LexisNexis Risk Solutions. 26 March 2026

NEWS FEED

    March 26, 2026

    UK – Mandatory Ethnicity And Disability Pay Gap Reporting: Government Publishes Its Consultation Response.

    March 26, 2026

    Changes To Collective Redundancy: What Employers Need To Know.

    March 26, 2026

    India – Refusal Of Patent Without Adequate Reasoning Set Aside: Delhi High Court Remands Case For Fresh Consideration.

    - DPS Parmar - Lex Orbis,
    March 26, 2026

    India – No Licence, No Performance: Bombay High Court Restrains Restaurants From Using Sound Recordings Without License.

    - Manisha Singh - Lex Orbis,
    March 26, 2026

    India – Delhi High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal Of Smelling Disease Patent.

    - DPS Parmar - Lex Orbis,
    March 26, 2026

    India – Trademark Protection In Ayurveda: Delhi High Court Clarifies Deceptive Similarity And Dominant Features.

    - Manisha Singh - Lex Orbis,
    March 26, 2026

    China – CSRC Releases Short Swing Profit Rules.

    - XIE, Qing (Natasha) - JunHe, JunHE
    March 26, 2026

    China – The Criminal Law Risks Of ‘Raising Crayfish’: From Technological Enthusiasm To Legal Boundaries.

    - YIN, Xiao (Benjamin) - JunHe,
    March 25, 2026

    Salts V Pelican: UK Patent Infringement Appeal Fails But Novelty And Costs Arguments Succeed.

    March 25, 2026

    India – Order For Refusal Of Patent Set Aside: Delhi High Court Directs Re-Consideration Of Inventive Step Using ‘Hoffman Test’.

    - DPS Parmar - Lex Orbis,

Footer

Conventus Law
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

CONVENTUS LAW

  • About Us
  • Explore
  • Video
  • Events
  • Contact Us
  • Jurisdiction Channel
  • Practice Area Channel
  • Industry Channel
  • Law Firms
  • Business Of Law
  • Special Reports

OTHERS

CONVENTUS DOCS
CONVENTUS PEOPLE

Room 1601, 16th Floor,               Wing On Centre, 111 Connaught Road Central, Hong Kong

social@conventuslaw.com

Terms of use | Privacy statement © 2026 Conventus Law. All Rights Reserved.