• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Conventus Law

Conventus Law

Conventus Law

  • About Us
  • Channels
    • Jurisdiction Channel
    • Practice Area Channel
    • Industry Channel
    • Business Of Law
    • Law Firms
    • Special Reports
  • Video
  • Events
  • Explore
  • Search
  • Membership
  • Conventus Doc
x
Search

More results...

Generic filters
Home » Special Report » Taking Action Against Shadow Companies In Hong Kong.

Taking Action Against Shadow Companies In Hong Kong.

October 2, 2015

October 2, 2015 by

5 September, 2015 

 

 

Shadow Companies – The Problem
 
A shadow company is a Hong Kong-registered company that uses a famous brand or company name as part of its own name, whilst being totally unconnected to the brand owner.
 
Shadow companies are normally used as fronts to allow individuals behind them to trade off the reputation of a brand owner’s name in the PRC. 

The key elements of a shadow company are:
 
a. it has registered a name which incorporates the name of a well known brand;
b. its director(s)/shareholder(s) are PRC individuals;
c. its company secretary is a secretarial company which will usually incorporate the shadow company and provide its registered office address; and
d. it will authorise a separate PRC entity, which is often connected to the individuals behind the shadow company, to use its name, claiming authorisation from the brand owner.

In our experience, the shadow company will register their registered office address as their place of business with the Inland Revenue so that they have a Business Registration Certificate, giving the illusion they are trading in Hong Kong. 
 
In addition, the shadow company may also apply for a Hong Kong trademark under different classes to those used by the legitimate brand owner. 
 
Shadow companies pose substantial risks of financial and reputational damage to brand owners.

 

What Can You Do As Brand Owner?

 

Taking Action Against Shadow Companies In Hong Kong.

 

The first step would be to send a cease and desist letter to the shadow company demanding they stop infringing your intellectual property rights. The threat of using court proceedings may cause the infringement to cease and the director of the shadow company to change the company name. 
 
If no response is made, the next step would be to issue court proceedings against the shadow company. 
 
Once a writ is issued it is unusual for the shadow company to defend the proceedings. Normally default judgment and an injunction can be obtained within 2 months of proceedings being issued.
 
The last step, after an injunction has been ordered, would be to serve the injunction on the Companies Registry. The Companies Registrar will require the company to change its name within 6 weeks of being informed of the injunction. In the event the director does not change the name of the shadow company the Companies Registrar will arrange for the company’s registered number to be substituted in place of its name. 

CH-CoatedSHlogo_CMYK-withSpace

 

For further information, please contact:

 

Jezamine Fewins, Partner, Stephenson Harwood

jezamine.fewins@shlegal.com

Primary Sidebar

PRESS RELEASES

  • Linklaters Advises On 51WORLD’s Placing Of New H Shares On HKEX. 14 July 2026
  • Sidley Represents Sino Biopharm In An Exclusive License Agreement With Astrazeneca. 14 July 2026
  • Linklaters Advises Zhipu AI On US$4bn Placing Of New H Shares. 14 July 2026
  • Malaysia – High Court Upholds Dismissal Of Bank Manager In The “Missing Pressure Cooker” Case And Reaffirms Limits On Appellate Intervention. 13 July 2026
  • Bird & Bird Advises A Global Aerospace Company On Its First UK Lease. 13 July 2026

NEWS FEED

    July 14, 2026

    India – Delhi High Court Examines Commercial Use Of Social Media Platform’s Music Library In Copyright Dispute.

    - Manisha Singh - Lex Orbis,
    July 14, 2026

    India – Draft Regulations For Use Of Artificial Intelligence In Courts, 2026: Analysing The Framework For Responsible AI Adoption In The Judiciary.

    - Manisha Singh - Lex Orbis,
    July 14, 2026

    Philippines – The Digital Trail And The Right To Privacy.

    - Nilo T. Divina - DivinaLaw,
    Special Report On Cybersecurity In The Philippines. Explore the current legal landscape of cybersecurity in the Philippines. This special report covers the Cybercrime Prevention Act, National Privacy Commission (NPC) enforcement trends, and essential data protection compliance for businesses.
    July 14, 2026

    Philippines – Consent Is Not Collusion.

    - Nilo T. Divina - DivinaLaw,
    July 14, 2026

    India – Vidarbha: The Final Chapter.

    July 14, 2026

    India – Global Access Providers In IFSC, Gift City: A Gateway To Global Markets.

    July 14, 2026

    India – When Equals Disagree: The Fallout Of A 50:50 JV.

    - Bharat Vasani - Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas,
    July 14, 2026

    India – Compounding Of Non-Reporting Contraventions Under FEMA.

    July 14, 2026

    India – Raise The Objection, Not The Expectation: Arbitral Tribunal Need Not Decide Section 16 Application First.

    July 13, 2026

    Hong Kong – Business Impact: Surging Vacancies And The Search For Yield.

    - Simon Reid-Kay - Simon Reid-Kay & Associates,

Footer

Conventus Law
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

CONVENTUS LAW

  • About Us
  • Explore
  • Video
  • Events
  • Contact Us
  • Jurisdiction Channel
  • Practice Area Channel
  • Industry Channel
  • Law Firms
  • Business Of Law
  • Special Reports

OTHERS

CONVENTUS DOCS
CONVENTUS PEOPLE

Room 1601, 16th Floor,               Wing On Centre, 111 Connaught Road Central, Hong Kong

social@conventuslaw.com

Terms of use | Privacy statement © 2026 Conventus Law. All Rights Reserved.