• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Conventus Law

Conventus Law

Conventus Law

  • About Us
  • Channels
    • Jurisdiction Channel
    • Practice Area Channel
    • Industry Channel
    • Business Of Law
    • Law Firms
    • Special Reports
  • Video
  • Events
  • Explore
  • Search
  • Membership
  • Conventus Doc
x
Search

More results...

Generic filters
Home » Special Report » Taking Action Against Shadow Companies In Hong Kong.

Taking Action Against Shadow Companies In Hong Kong.

October 2, 2015

October 2, 2015 by

5 September, 2015 

 

 

Shadow Companies – The Problem
 
A shadow company is a Hong Kong-registered company that uses a famous brand or company name as part of its own name, whilst being totally unconnected to the brand owner.
 
Shadow companies are normally used as fronts to allow individuals behind them to trade off the reputation of a brand owner’s name in the PRC. 

The key elements of a shadow company are:
 
a. it has registered a name which incorporates the name of a well known brand;
b. its director(s)/shareholder(s) are PRC individuals;
c. its company secretary is a secretarial company which will usually incorporate the shadow company and provide its registered office address; and
d. it will authorise a separate PRC entity, which is often connected to the individuals behind the shadow company, to use its name, claiming authorisation from the brand owner.

In our experience, the shadow company will register their registered office address as their place of business with the Inland Revenue so that they have a Business Registration Certificate, giving the illusion they are trading in Hong Kong. 
 
In addition, the shadow company may also apply for a Hong Kong trademark under different classes to those used by the legitimate brand owner. 
 
Shadow companies pose substantial risks of financial and reputational damage to brand owners.

 

What Can You Do As Brand Owner?

 

Taking Action Against Shadow Companies In Hong Kong.

 

The first step would be to send a cease and desist letter to the shadow company demanding they stop infringing your intellectual property rights. The threat of using court proceedings may cause the infringement to cease and the director of the shadow company to change the company name. 
 
If no response is made, the next step would be to issue court proceedings against the shadow company. 
 
Once a writ is issued it is unusual for the shadow company to defend the proceedings. Normally default judgment and an injunction can be obtained within 2 months of proceedings being issued.
 
The last step, after an injunction has been ordered, would be to serve the injunction on the Companies Registry. The Companies Registrar will require the company to change its name within 6 weeks of being informed of the injunction. In the event the director does not change the name of the shadow company the Companies Registrar will arrange for the company’s registered number to be substituted in place of its name. 

CH-CoatedSHlogo_CMYK-withSpace

 

For further information, please contact:

 

Jezamine Fewins, Partner, Stephenson Harwood

jezamine.fewins@shlegal.com

Primary Sidebar

PRESS RELEASES

  • Philippines – Dulog Legal Mounts Legal Aid Initiative In Cebu. 26 May 2026
  • Malaysia – The Asset Triple A Sustainable Infrastructure Awards 2026. 25 May 2026
  • Appleby Advises Apogee Acquisition Corp In Its US$172.5 Million Initial Public Offering. 25 May 2026
  • Appleby Advises West Enclave Merger Corp. In Its USD100M Initial Public Offering. 25 May 2026
  • Appleby Advises Forefront Tech Holdings Acquisition Corp. In Its US$100 Million Initial Public Offering. 25 May 2026

NEWS FEED

    May 26, 2026

    India – Guarding Creativity Online: Delhi High Court On Copyright And Passing Off In Social Media Advertising.

    - Manisha Singh - Lex Orbis,
    May 26, 2026

    India – Failure To Apply ‘Hoffmann Test’ And Non-Communication Of Objections: Bombay High Court Remands Patent Refusal Order.

    - DPS Parmar - Lex Orbis,
    May 26, 2026

    India – Autonomy Of Sports Federations: Delhi High Court Examines Limits Of Court Intervention In AIFF Governance.

    - Manisha Singh - Lex Orbis,
    May 26, 2026

    Malaysia’s National Carbon Market Policy: What Businesses Need To Know.

    May 26, 2026

    2026 Virtual Assets And RWA Tokenisation: The Chinese Mainland’s End But A Hong Kong’s Regulated Start?

    - Basil Hwang - Hauzen LLP,
    May 26, 2026

    Sri Lanka VAT Changes 2026: Key Updates Businesses Must Know.

    - Dijen De Saram,
    May 26, 2026

    Maternity Benefits In Sri Lanka: Leave Entitlements & Employee Rights.

    - Savantha De Saram - D.L.&F. DE SARAM,
    May 26, 2026

    India – Pushing Boundaries: India And Nordic Region Forge Ahead With Strategic, Economic, And Green Collaboration.

    May 26, 2026

    India – Findings Of A Civil Court Binding On Criminal Court? SC Clears The Air.

    May 26, 2026

    Finality In PE/ VC Exits Across Borders: SC Endorses Transnational Issue Estoppel.

Footer

Conventus Law
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

CONVENTUS LAW

  • About Us
  • Explore
  • Video
  • Events
  • Contact Us
  • Jurisdiction Channel
  • Practice Area Channel
  • Industry Channel
  • Law Firms
  • Business Of Law
  • Special Reports

OTHERS

CONVENTUS DOCS
CONVENTUS PEOPLE

Room 1601, 16th Floor,               Wing On Centre, 111 Connaught Road Central, Hong Kong

social@conventuslaw.com

Terms of use | Privacy statement © 2026 Conventus Law. All Rights Reserved.