• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Conventus Law

Conventus Law

Conventus Law

  • About Us
  • Channels
    • Jurisdiction Channel
    • Practice Area Channel
    • Industry Channel
    • Business Of Law
    • Law Firms
    • Special Reports
  • Video
  • Events
  • Explore
  • Search
  • Membership
  • Conventus Doc
x
Search

More results...

Generic filters
Home » Special Report » Taking Action Against Shadow Companies In Hong Kong.

Taking Action Against Shadow Companies In Hong Kong.

October 2, 2015

October 2, 2015 by

5 September, 2015 

 

 

Shadow Companies – The Problem
 
A shadow company is a Hong Kong-registered company that uses a famous brand or company name as part of its own name, whilst being totally unconnected to the brand owner.
 
Shadow companies are normally used as fronts to allow individuals behind them to trade off the reputation of a brand owner’s name in the PRC. 

The key elements of a shadow company are:
 
a. it has registered a name which incorporates the name of a well known brand;
b. its director(s)/shareholder(s) are PRC individuals;
c. its company secretary is a secretarial company which will usually incorporate the shadow company and provide its registered office address; and
d. it will authorise a separate PRC entity, which is often connected to the individuals behind the shadow company, to use its name, claiming authorisation from the brand owner.

In our experience, the shadow company will register their registered office address as their place of business with the Inland Revenue so that they have a Business Registration Certificate, giving the illusion they are trading in Hong Kong. 
 
In addition, the shadow company may also apply for a Hong Kong trademark under different classes to those used by the legitimate brand owner. 
 
Shadow companies pose substantial risks of financial and reputational damage to brand owners.

 

What Can You Do As Brand Owner?

 

Taking Action Against Shadow Companies In Hong Kong.

 

The first step would be to send a cease and desist letter to the shadow company demanding they stop infringing your intellectual property rights. The threat of using court proceedings may cause the infringement to cease and the director of the shadow company to change the company name. 
 
If no response is made, the next step would be to issue court proceedings against the shadow company. 
 
Once a writ is issued it is unusual for the shadow company to defend the proceedings. Normally default judgment and an injunction can be obtained within 2 months of proceedings being issued.
 
The last step, after an injunction has been ordered, would be to serve the injunction on the Companies Registry. The Companies Registrar will require the company to change its name within 6 weeks of being informed of the injunction. In the event the director does not change the name of the shadow company the Companies Registrar will arrange for the company’s registered number to be substituted in place of its name. 

CH-CoatedSHlogo_CMYK-withSpace

 

For further information, please contact:

 

Jezamine Fewins, Partner, Stephenson Harwood

jezamine.fewins@shlegal.com

Primary Sidebar

PRESS RELEASES

  • Philippines – SyCipLaw Hosts Kapihan Session In Subic: Updates On Taxation, Employment, And Immigration Laws. 28 November 2025
  • UK – Skadden Advises Saturn On Inaugural £180 Million Regulatory Capital Bond Issuance. 28 November 2025
  • US – Skadden Advises OAK Global On New Lloyd’s Syndicate. 28 November 2025
  • Deacons Partners And Consultants Named In China Business Law Journal’s “The A-List 2025-26: Visionaries”. 27 November 2025
  • Hong Kong – Deacons Once Again Achieves Strong Rankings In The Legal 500 Asia Pacific 2026 Guide. 27 November 2025

NEWS FEED

    November 28, 2025

    UK – FCA’s Multi-Firm Review Of Consolidation In The Financial Advice And Wealth Management Sector.

    November 28, 2025

    US – FTC Loses Retroactive Merger Challenge As Court Concludes That Meta Is Not A Monopolist.

    November 28, 2025

    Malaysia – Federal Court Restores Commercial Reality And Clarifies The Law On Liquidators’ Powers. 

    - Rabindra S. Nathan - Shearn Delamore & Co,
    November 28, 2025

    Malaysia – New Process: Exit Clearance For Employment Pass (“EP”) And Professional Visit Pass (“PVP”) Holders.

    - Suganthi Singam - Shearn Delamore & Co,
    November 28, 2025

    Malaysia – Employment & Industrial Relations Update: Industrial Court Upholds Dismissal Over Verbal Sexual Harassment.

    November 27, 2025

    Hong Kong – IPO And Pre-IPO Private Funds Reclaim Their Pre-Covid 19 Drive.

    - Fiona Fong - Deacons, Deacons
    November 27, 2025

    Halal Regulations In Vietnam’s F&B Industry.

    November 27, 2025

    Singapore – MAS Consults On New AI Risk Management Guidelines For Financial Institutions.

    November 27, 2025

    Linklaters Global Regulation Update Vol. 86.

    November 26, 2025

    Azmi & Associates – Sustainability In The Time Of Trump.

Footer

Conventus Law
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

CONVENTUS LAW

  • About Us
  • Explore
  • Video
  • Events
  • Contact Us
  • Jurisdiction Channel
  • Practice Area Channel
  • Industry Channel
  • Law Firms
  • Business Of Law
  • Special Reports

OTHERS

CONVENTUS DOCS
CONVENTUS PEOPLE

3/f, 13/F, Two Harbourfront, 22 Tak Fung Street, Hunghom, Kowloon, Hong Kong

social@conventuslaw.com

Terms of use | Privacy statement © 2025 Conventus Law. All Rights Reserved.