• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Conventus Law

Conventus Law

Conventus Law

  • About Us
  • Channels
    • Jurisdiction Channel
    • Practice Area Channel
    • Industry Channel
    • Business Of Law
    • Law Firms
    • Special Reports
  • Video
  • Events
  • Explore
  • Search
  • Membership
  • Conventus Doc
x
Search

More results...

Generic filters
Home » Special Report » Taking Action Against Shadow Companies In Hong Kong.

Taking Action Against Shadow Companies In Hong Kong.

October 2, 2015

October 2, 2015 by

5 September, 2015 

 

 

Shadow Companies – The Problem
 
A shadow company is a Hong Kong-registered company that uses a famous brand or company name as part of its own name, whilst being totally unconnected to the brand owner.
 
Shadow companies are normally used as fronts to allow individuals behind them to trade off the reputation of a brand owner’s name in the PRC. 

The key elements of a shadow company are:
 
a. it has registered a name which incorporates the name of a well known brand;
b. its director(s)/shareholder(s) are PRC individuals;
c. its company secretary is a secretarial company which will usually incorporate the shadow company and provide its registered office address; and
d. it will authorise a separate PRC entity, which is often connected to the individuals behind the shadow company, to use its name, claiming authorisation from the brand owner.

In our experience, the shadow company will register their registered office address as their place of business with the Inland Revenue so that they have a Business Registration Certificate, giving the illusion they are trading in Hong Kong. 
 
In addition, the shadow company may also apply for a Hong Kong trademark under different classes to those used by the legitimate brand owner. 
 
Shadow companies pose substantial risks of financial and reputational damage to brand owners.

 

What Can You Do As Brand Owner?

 

Taking Action Against Shadow Companies In Hong Kong.

 

The first step would be to send a cease and desist letter to the shadow company demanding they stop infringing your intellectual property rights. The threat of using court proceedings may cause the infringement to cease and the director of the shadow company to change the company name. 
 
If no response is made, the next step would be to issue court proceedings against the shadow company. 
 
Once a writ is issued it is unusual for the shadow company to defend the proceedings. Normally default judgment and an injunction can be obtained within 2 months of proceedings being issued.
 
The last step, after an injunction has been ordered, would be to serve the injunction on the Companies Registry. The Companies Registrar will require the company to change its name within 6 weeks of being informed of the injunction. In the event the director does not change the name of the shadow company the Companies Registrar will arrange for the company’s registered number to be substituted in place of its name. 

CH-CoatedSHlogo_CMYK-withSpace

 

For further information, please contact:

 

Jezamine Fewins, Partner, Stephenson Harwood

jezamine.fewins@shlegal.com

Primary Sidebar

PRESS RELEASES

  • Skadden Recognized As A Leading Firm In Chambers UK 2026. 17 October 2025
  • UK – Linklaters Recognised As A Top Firm For Social Mobility. 16 October 2025
  • Linklaters Advises EQT Healthcare Growth On The Luxembourg Legal Aspects Of Its Acquisition Of Europa Biosite. 16 October 2025
  • India – Seminar On “Leveraging GI For Economic Growth, Cultural Preservation, And Global Recognition” & GI Excellence Awards – Gujarat Chapter. 16 October 2025
  • Singapore – Shook Lin & Bok Recognised In IP Stars 2025 Rankings; Jevon Louis Named As A Patent Star. 16 October 2025

NEWS FEED

    October 17, 2025

    UK Employment Flash.

    October 17, 2025

    Hot Topics In Corporate Governance In Indonesia.

    - Ira Andamara Eddymurthy - SSEK,
    October 17, 2025

    Philippines – SEC Issues New Green Equity Guidelines.

    - Philbert E. Varona - SyCipLaw, SyCip Salazar Hernandez & Gatmaitan
    October 17, 2025

    Philippines – Tax Updates June 2025 (SyCipLaw Tax Issues And Practical Solutions (T.I.P.S.) International Edition Vol. 13).

    - Carina C. Laforteza - SyCipLaw,
    October 17, 2025

    Safeguarding Well-Known Trademarks In The Digital Age With Dynamic Injunctions And Summary Judgments.

    - Manisha Singh - Lex Orbis,
    October 17, 2025

    India – Balancing Functionality And Aesthetic Appeal: Travel Blue Wins In Design Piracy Dispute.

    - Manisha Singh - Lex Orbis,
    October 17, 2025

    Philippines – SEC Amends Rules On Shelf-Registration.

    - Philbert E. Varona - SyCipLaw, SyCip Salazar Hernandez & Gatmaitan
    October 17, 2025

    China – Emerging Trends In Criminal Cases Involving Internet Companies: Analysis Of High-Frequency Crimes And Risk Control Suggestions.

    October 16, 2025

    US – SEC Transactions And Compliance (“STAC”) Group – Q3 Round-Up.

    October 16, 2025

    Vietnam’s Draft Law On Specialised Courts: Lessons From England’s CPR.

    - Le Net - LNT & Partners,

Footer

Conventus Law
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

CONVENTUS LAW

  • About Us
  • Explore
  • Video
  • Events
  • Contact Us
  • Jurisdiction Channel
  • Practice Area Channel
  • Industry Channel
  • Law Firms
  • Business Of Law
  • Special Reports

OTHERS

CONVENTUS DOCS
CONVENTUS PEOPLE

3/f, 13/F, Two Harbourfront, 22 Tak Fung Street, Hunghom, Kowloon, Hong Kong

social@conventuslaw.com

Terms of use | Privacy statement © 2025 Conventus Law. All Rights Reserved.