• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Conventus Law

Conventus Law

Conventus Law

  • About Us
  • Channels
    • Jurisdiction Channel
    • Practice Area Channel
    • Industry Channel
    • Business Of Law
    • Law Firms
    • Special Reports
  • Video
  • Events
  • Explore
  • Search
  • Membership
  • Conventus Doc
x
Search

More results...

Generic filters
Home » Special Report » Taking Action Against Shadow Companies In Hong Kong.

Taking Action Against Shadow Companies In Hong Kong.

October 2, 2015

October 2, 2015 by

5 September, 2015 

 

 

Shadow Companies – The Problem
 
A shadow company is a Hong Kong-registered company that uses a famous brand or company name as part of its own name, whilst being totally unconnected to the brand owner.
 
Shadow companies are normally used as fronts to allow individuals behind them to trade off the reputation of a brand owner’s name in the PRC. 

The key elements of a shadow company are:
 
a. it has registered a name which incorporates the name of a well known brand;
b. its director(s)/shareholder(s) are PRC individuals;
c. its company secretary is a secretarial company which will usually incorporate the shadow company and provide its registered office address; and
d. it will authorise a separate PRC entity, which is often connected to the individuals behind the shadow company, to use its name, claiming authorisation from the brand owner.

In our experience, the shadow company will register their registered office address as their place of business with the Inland Revenue so that they have a Business Registration Certificate, giving the illusion they are trading in Hong Kong. 
 
In addition, the shadow company may also apply for a Hong Kong trademark under different classes to those used by the legitimate brand owner. 
 
Shadow companies pose substantial risks of financial and reputational damage to brand owners.

 

What Can You Do As Brand Owner?

 

Taking Action Against Shadow Companies In Hong Kong.

 

The first step would be to send a cease and desist letter to the shadow company demanding they stop infringing your intellectual property rights. The threat of using court proceedings may cause the infringement to cease and the director of the shadow company to change the company name. 
 
If no response is made, the next step would be to issue court proceedings against the shadow company. 
 
Once a writ is issued it is unusual for the shadow company to defend the proceedings. Normally default judgment and an injunction can be obtained within 2 months of proceedings being issued.
 
The last step, after an injunction has been ordered, would be to serve the injunction on the Companies Registry. The Companies Registrar will require the company to change its name within 6 weeks of being informed of the injunction. In the event the director does not change the name of the shadow company the Companies Registrar will arrange for the company’s registered number to be substituted in place of its name. 

CH-CoatedSHlogo_CMYK-withSpace

 

For further information, please contact:

 

Jezamine Fewins, Partner, Stephenson Harwood

jezamine.fewins@shlegal.com

Primary Sidebar

PRESS RELEASES

  • UK – 19th Global Brand Protection Innovation Programme Returns To London | 29–30 April 2026. 20 February 2026
  • Bird & Bird Advises WSC Sports On Its Acquisition Of Partnerbrite. 20 February 2026
  • SyCipLaw Maintains Band 1 Rankings In Chambers Global 2026 Guide. 20 February 2026
  • Scopely To Acquire Majority Stake In Pixel Flow! 20 February 2026
  • Skadden Receives Top Rankings In Chambers Global 2026. 20 February 2026

NEWS FEED

    February 20, 2026

    Bird & Bird Advises Kainova Therapeutics On Its Series B Funding Round Of $CAD 32 Million.

    February 20, 2026

    Singapore As A Global Hub For International Dispute Resolution.

    February 20, 2026

    Non-Resident Sports Agents And Permanent Establishment In Italy: Practical Takeaways From A Landmark Ruling.

    February 20, 2026

    Trademark Lessons From Malaysia: Protecting Your Brand before It’s Copied – From Penang Icons To PETRONAS.

    February 20, 2026

    EU – EIOPA Consults On Supervisory Statement For Authorizing And Supervising (Re)insurance Undertakings Related To Private Equity.

    - Robert A. Chaplin - Skadden,
    February 20, 2026

    US – Federal District Court In Texas Tosses FTC’s 2025 HSR Filing Rules.

    February 20, 2026

    New Law Seeks To Modernize Philippine Animal Industry.

    February 19, 2026

    Vietnam’s AI Law: Key Takeaways and Preliminary Observations.

    - Hoang Nguyen Ha Quyen - LNT & Partners,
    February 19, 2026

    Vietnam – The 2025 Law On E-Commerce: Towards A New Governance Regime And The Stratification Of Liability In The Digital Economy.

    February 19, 2026

    UK – Real Estate Talking Points: Fast-tracking Growth: What The Planning & Infrastructure Act 2025 And Proposed Reform To The NPPF Means For Real Estate & Energy.

Footer

Conventus Law
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

CONVENTUS LAW

  • About Us
  • Explore
  • Video
  • Events
  • Contact Us
  • Jurisdiction Channel
  • Practice Area Channel
  • Industry Channel
  • Law Firms
  • Business Of Law
  • Special Reports

OTHERS

CONVENTUS DOCS
CONVENTUS PEOPLE

3/f, 13/F, Two Harbourfront, 22 Tak Fung Street, Hunghom, Kowloon, Hong Kong

social@conventuslaw.com

Terms of use | Privacy statement © 2026 Conventus Law. All Rights Reserved.