• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Conventus Law

Conventus Law

Conventus Law

  • About Us
  • Channels
    • Jurisdiction Channel
    • Practice Area Channel
    • Industry Channel
    • Business Of Law
    • Law Firms
    • Special Reports
  • Video
  • Events
  • Explore
  • Search
  • Membership
  • Conventus Doc
x
Search

More results...

Generic filters
Home » Special Report » Taking Action Against Shadow Companies In Hong Kong.

Taking Action Against Shadow Companies In Hong Kong.

October 2, 2015

October 2, 2015 by

5 September, 2015 

 

 

Shadow Companies – The Problem
 
A shadow company is a Hong Kong-registered company that uses a famous brand or company name as part of its own name, whilst being totally unconnected to the brand owner.
 
Shadow companies are normally used as fronts to allow individuals behind them to trade off the reputation of a brand owner’s name in the PRC. 

The key elements of a shadow company are:
 
a. it has registered a name which incorporates the name of a well known brand;
b. its director(s)/shareholder(s) are PRC individuals;
c. its company secretary is a secretarial company which will usually incorporate the shadow company and provide its registered office address; and
d. it will authorise a separate PRC entity, which is often connected to the individuals behind the shadow company, to use its name, claiming authorisation from the brand owner.

In our experience, the shadow company will register their registered office address as their place of business with the Inland Revenue so that they have a Business Registration Certificate, giving the illusion they are trading in Hong Kong. 
 
In addition, the shadow company may also apply for a Hong Kong trademark under different classes to those used by the legitimate brand owner. 
 
Shadow companies pose substantial risks of financial and reputational damage to brand owners.

 

What Can You Do As Brand Owner?

 

Taking Action Against Shadow Companies In Hong Kong.

 

The first step would be to send a cease and desist letter to the shadow company demanding they stop infringing your intellectual property rights. The threat of using court proceedings may cause the infringement to cease and the director of the shadow company to change the company name. 
 
If no response is made, the next step would be to issue court proceedings against the shadow company. 
 
Once a writ is issued it is unusual for the shadow company to defend the proceedings. Normally default judgment and an injunction can be obtained within 2 months of proceedings being issued.
 
The last step, after an injunction has been ordered, would be to serve the injunction on the Companies Registry. The Companies Registrar will require the company to change its name within 6 weeks of being informed of the injunction. In the event the director does not change the name of the shadow company the Companies Registrar will arrange for the company’s registered number to be substituted in place of its name. 

CH-CoatedSHlogo_CMYK-withSpace

 

For further information, please contact:

 

Jezamine Fewins, Partner, Stephenson Harwood

jezamine.fewins@shlegal.com

Primary Sidebar

PRESS RELEASES

  • Macau – Lei Wun Kong, Chang San Chi And Calvin Chui Included In The GBA Arbitrator List. 15 January 2026
  • Belgium – Liesbeth Truyens, Economic Sanctions And Commercial Disputes Lawyer, Joins Crowell & Moring’s Brussels Office. 14 January 2026
  • US – Crowell & Moring Elects 15 New Partners, Promotes One To Senior Counsel And 26 To Counsel. 14 January 2026
  • UK – Legal Industry Experts Explore The Future Of AI In Litigation For 2026 And Beyond. 14 January 2026
  • Bird & Bird Boosts Dispute Resolution Team In Hong Kong. 13 January 2026

NEWS FEED

    January 15, 2026

    Poland’s First UOKiK Fines For Price Reductions – What You Need To Know.

    January 15, 2026

    EU – We Present The 2026 Edition Of Our Annual Note, With An Overview Of The Topics We Expect To Be On The Agenda For Debt Capital Markets In 2026.

    January 15, 2026

    EU – Disputes And Investigations In Europe (2026) – Prepare For The Unexpected.

    January 15, 2026

    UK – Pension Scheme Surplus In Focus: What Trustees And Sponsors Need To Know.

    January 15, 2026

    China – An Introduction To The New Licensing Regime For Virtual Asset Deals, Virtual Asset Advice And Virtual Asset Management Services.

    January 15, 2026

    Generative AI Document Review: Experts Compare Notes.

    January 15, 2026

    Malaysia – Agentic AI: Between Efficiency, Autonomy, And Legal Unease.

    January 14, 2026

    UK – The Fine Line: Where Pay Transparency Regulation And Competition Law Risk Intersect.

    January 14, 2026

    Belgium – New Rules In Relation To Work Incapacity Strengthened Return-To-Work Policy And Reintegration Trajectory 3.0: What Changes As Of 1 January 2026.

    January 14, 2026

    US – Colorado Judge Quashes DOJ Gender-Related Care Subpoena.

Footer

Conventus Law
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

CONVENTUS LAW

  • About Us
  • Explore
  • Video
  • Events
  • Contact Us
  • Jurisdiction Channel
  • Practice Area Channel
  • Industry Channel
  • Law Firms
  • Business Of Law
  • Special Reports

OTHERS

CONVENTUS DOCS
CONVENTUS PEOPLE

3/f, 13/F, Two Harbourfront, 22 Tak Fung Street, Hunghom, Kowloon, Hong Kong

social@conventuslaw.com

Terms of use | Privacy statement © 2026 Conventus Law. All Rights Reserved.